| Section 2 - Applied Pharmacokinetics |
Introduction
Although numerous publications in the past several years have described
the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in various patient populations,
disparity still exists regarding the most appropriate methods of
monitoring, including therapeutic range, timing of peak determinations,
and methods for determining doses.
Antimicrobial spectrum
Significant controversy has arisen in recent years regarding the
efficiency by which vancomycin kills gram positive bacteria and the
potential misuse of the drug. Several studies have shown that with
both staphylococci and enterococci vancomycin does not kill the bacteria
as quickly or sterilize the blood as rapidly as nafcillin or ampicillin.
For this reason many authors suggest that unless the patient has an
allergy to beta-lactams or has a methicillin resistant staphylococcal
infection, the patient might be better served using a beta-lactam
agent over vancomycin.
Concern over the ever increasing problems with vancomycin resistant
enterococci (VRE) prompted the Center for Disease Control to issue a
statement suggesting appropriate prescribing criteria vancomycin
(MMWR 44:No RR-12, September 22, 1994). Vancomycin is not recommended
for:
Vancomycin is primarily effective against gram-positive cocci. Staphylococcus
aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, including both
methicillin-susceptible (MSSA & MSSE) or resistant-species (MRSA & MRSE),
are usually sensitive to vancomycin with minimum inhibiting concentrations
(MIC) less than 1.5 mcg/ml. Most strains of streptococcus are sensitive
to vancomycin. Vancomycin is considered bactericidal (MBC/MIC < 4)
except with enterococci and some tolerant (MBC/MIC > 32) staphylococci.
When staphylococcal tolerance has been demonstrated, most clinicians
add a second antibiotic such as an aminoglycoside to the regimen.
Enterococcal infections should be treated with vancomycin combined with
gentamicin. Vancomycin is also effective against the anaerobes,
diphtheroids and clostridium species, including C. difficile.
Pharmacokinetics
When given by IV infusion over 60 minutes, vancomycin follows a 2-compartment
pharmacokinetic model; alpha (distribution) and ß (elimination). The
alpha (distribution) phase is relatively long, averaging two hours. This has
important implications for serum level sampling.
![]() | If the one compartment model is used, the peak level must be drawn after the distribution phase, which is at least one hour after the end of the infusion. |
Concentration-toxicity relationships
A histamine-mediated reaction, often called 'red man syndrome', involves
a rash over the upper body, possibly accompanied by hypotension. The
syndrome is thought to be related to peak serum concentration. Healy
(1990) reported that none of 11 volunteers receiving vancomycin 500mg
every 6 hours demonstrated evidence of this reaction, while 9 of the
same 11 showed symptoms consistent with 'red man syndrome' when
receiving vancomycin 1000mg every 12 hours.
Vancomycin nephrotoxicity appears to be concentration-related, with an increased risk at trough concentrations greater than
15 mcg/ml.
Higher vancomycin doses carry a substantial risk for nephrotoxicity. Recent studies have shown that higher-dose vancomycin
regimens are associated with a higher likelihood of vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity. A significant difference in nephrotoxicity
between patients receiving >= 4 g vancomycin/day vs those receiving < 4 g vancomycin/day was noted: 34.6% vs 10.9%.
Critically ill patients, patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, and patients with already compromised renal
function are particularly at risk for vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. This risk is incremental with higher trough levels
and longer duration of vancomycin use.
Patients with multiple risk factors are particularly at risk for vancomycin induced nephrotoxicity.
Ototoxicity is an infrequent event occurring in fewer than 2% of patients
receiving vancomycin. It is unclear whether elevated trough or peak
levels are responsible for ototoxicity. Data in the literature suggest
that trough levels of 13 to 32 mcg/ml and peak levels of 21 to 62 mcg/ml
are associated with this adverse effect. Such a wide range makes
determination of the precise correlation of vancomycin serum levels with
otoxicity difficult.
Concentration-efficacy relationships
The ideal dosing regimen for vancomycin maximizes the amount of drug received.
Therefore, the 24h-AUC/MIC ratio is the parameter that correlates with efficacy.
For vancomycin, a 24h-AUC/MIC ratio of at least 400 is necessary for MRSA.
The pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin are:
24h-AUC/MIC ratio | Satisfactory | Unsatisfactory |
< 125 | 4 (50%) | 4 |
> 125 | 71 (97%) | 2 |
Dosing methods
Modification of vancomycin dosing is a major concern in the patient
with renal insufficiency. For patients with creatinine clearances
less than 15ml/min, the method of Matzke may be the best choice.
Vancomycin is not removed appreciably by hemodialysis and thus is
administered only every 7 to 10 days in dialysis patients. Clearance
during peritoneal dialysis is more controversial. Originally thought
not to be removed by peritoneal dialysis, recent reports have shown
that vancomycin is cleared by this route. Dosing of vancomycin in
peritoneal dialysis patients remains controversial.
For evaluation of serum level data, methods incorporating Bayesian
principles appear to give the best overall predictive performance
compared with traditional methods of vancomycin dosage adjustment.
The Bayesian approach combines both population and patient-specific
information (i.e., serum level data) in predicting dosage requirements.
The pharmacokinetic model most widely used by clinicians has been
one-compartment. Because vancomycin exhibits a multi-compartment
pharmacokinetic profile, the clinical application of the one-compartment
model requires post-distribution serum samples which are often
difficult to accurately obtain. Compared with the 1-compartment
model, the 2-compartment model results in a significant improvement
in both bias and precision in predicting vancomycin peak and trough
concentrations.
The relatively unpredictable relationship between dose and resultant
serum levels of vancomycin has prompted the development of a wide
variety of dosing methods. For patients with creatinine clearances
of 15ml/min or greater, the method of Lake and Peterson appears to
be the least biased and most precise predictor of vancomycin dosage.
In their evaluation, 71% of peak concentrations were within the
range of 20 to 30 mcg/l, and 81% of trough levels were within the
range of 5 to 10 mcg/ml.
Population model parameters
Clearance
Given the variability of Vd and clearance seen with vancomycin, standard doses
are likely to be associated with a significant degree of variability in serum
concentrations.
Volume of distribution
Compared with aminoglycosides, the variability in the Vd of vancomycin
is extreme. Published inter-patient variability has been reported as
0.26 to 1.30 L/kg, 0.21 to 1.51 L/kg, 0.2 to 1.3 L/kg, and 0.37 to 1.40 L/kg
in a series of studies. The average Vd also
varies widely in the literature, with early reports suggesting a value of 0.9
L/kg and more recent studies indicating a Vd closer to 0.5 L/kg. There does not
appear to be any readily identifiable clinical characteristic to explain this
variability. Unlike the aminoglycosides where one can often predict a larger or
smaller than average Vd based on fluid status, variability in vancomycin Vd appears
to be completely unpredictable.
Like the aminoglycosides, vancomycin is primarily cleared by glomerular
filtration. Correlation of vancomycin clearance to creatinine clearance
typically gives values for slope of between 0.5 and 0.8 and y-intercept
(non-renal clearance) of up to 15 ml/min. All studies have demonstrated
a strong correlation between vancomycin clearance and creatinine clearance,
however, there is significant variability in the non-renal clearance component.
This unpredictability is particularly evident in patients with impaired renal
function who are more dependent on nonrenal clearance. Therefore, extra caution
is required when estimating clearance in patients with markedly decreased renal
function.
Monitoring parameters
Careful observation for signs of drug toxicity is imperative.
Obtain at steady-state (approximately four half lifes) after initiation and after dose changes.
Then at least weekly during therapy.
Measure every two days, or every day in unstable renal function.
Weigh patient every two to seven days.
Measure and monitor urine output daily.
Precautions
Drawing at exactly the right time is not as important as having the
lab note the exact times that the samples were drawn. Also,
have the nurse note the exact times that the sample infusion
was started and when it ended. Please be aware of the widespread
policy of nursing personnel to record a dose as having been given
exactly as ordered if it is given within 30 minutes of the recorded
time. This will lead to significant errors in analysis, please ensure
that all those involved record the exact times.
This issue cannot be stressed enough. Inaccurate recording of drug
administration times and lab draw times are the greatest source of
calculation error, having a greater effect than pharmacy preparation
error or lab assay error.
Section 2 - Applied Pharmacokinetics
www.rxkinetics.com
©Copyright 1984 - 2022, All rights reserved.
RxKinetics, Plattsburg, MO 64477